CSCS vs QQQ
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSCS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.60% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -36.29% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -43.93% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CSCS vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF (CSCS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSCS returned -43.93% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CSCS is down 36.29% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 28.0% for CSCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.6% for CSCS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSCS charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSCS currently yields 4.60% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CSCS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSCS or QQQ?
CSCS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSCS or QQQ?
Over the past year CSCS returned -43.93% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSCS annualized -38.54% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSCS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 28.0% for CSCS. Worst drawdown: CSCS -51.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CSCS and QQQ?
CSCS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSCS and QQQ?
CSCS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSCS or QQQ?
CSCS yields 4.60% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.