CSTK vs IVV
Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSTK delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSTK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $175M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.12% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.42% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CSTK vs IVV Performance
Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CSTK returned +24.42% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, CSTK is up 16.12% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for CSTK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for CSTK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSTK charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSTK currently yields 2.16% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CSTK and IVV share 50 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSTK or IVV?
CSTK has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSTK or IVV?
Over the past year CSTK returned +24.42% vs +21.64% for IVV, so CSTK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSTK annualized +28.56% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSTK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for CSTK. Worst drawdown: CSTK -9.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CSTK and IVV?
CSTK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSTK and IVV?
CSTK and IVV share 50 common holdings with a 19.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSTK or IVV?
CSTK yields 2.16% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CSTK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.