DEW vs QQQ
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DEW or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DEW led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DEW is less concentrated, with 15.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $163M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.14% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 690 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +19.67%Best | +17.33% |
| 1Y Return | +27.44%Best | +26.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.24% | +24.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.28% | +14.15%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.2% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,845 | $19,381Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.6%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2006 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2006 to Sep 3, 2026 (20.2 years).
DEW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DEW vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DEW returned +27.44% while QQQ returned +26.50%. Year to date, DEW is up 19.67% versus a gain of 17.33% for QQQ.
Over three years, DEW compounded at +20.24% per year against +24.58% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.28% and +14.15% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.78% annualized vs +2.95%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 16.8% for DEW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.2% for DEW and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEW charges 0.58% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $18 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEW currently yields 3.14% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
5.7% of DEW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings DEW also owns.
DEW and QQQ share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 680 positions we hold weights for in DEW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 690 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 87 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DEW (92.5% of the fund), and 232 for DEW that do not appear in QQQ (53.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DEW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.02% | 1.12% | 0.10% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.06% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.91% | 0.83% | 0.08% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.87% | 0.72% | 0.15% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 0.51% | 0.39% | 0.12% |
| PCARPaccar Inc. | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.19% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 0.47% | 0.30% | 0.17% |
| EXCExelon | 0.29% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 0.26% | 0.21% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DEW and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEW or QQQ?
DEW has an expense ratio of 0.58% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DEW or QQQ?
Over the past year DEW returned +27.44% vs +26.50% for QQQ, so DEW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DEW annualized +2.95% vs +15.78% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DEW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 16.8% for DEW. Worst drawdown: DEW -69.2% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both DEW and QQQ?
DEW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DEW and QQQ?
5.7% of DEW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.1% of QQQ's is in holdings DEW also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 680 positions we hold weights for in DEW and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEW or QQQ?
DEW yields 3.14% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DEW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DEW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DEW led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DEW is less concentrated, with 15.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.