DFGP vs VXUS
DFGP vs VXUS
Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFGP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.41% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 1,422 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.15% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
DFGP vs VXUS Performance
Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) is a ETF from Dimensional and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DFGP returned +3.15% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, DFGP is up 1.40% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.6% for DFGP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.2% for DFGP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFGP charges 0.22% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $5 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFGP currently yields 4.41% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
DFGP and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 8713 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFGP | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NST:AU | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFGP or VXUS?
DFGP has an expense ratio of 0.22% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DFGP or VXUS?
Over the past year DFGP returned +3.15% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DFGP annualized +6.95% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DFGP or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.6% for DFGP. Worst drawdown: DFGP -3.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both DFGP and VXUS?
DFGP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DFGP and VXUS?
DFGP and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8713 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFGP or VXUS?
DFGP yields 4.41% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so DFGP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.