DRUP vs IVV
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DRUP or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DRUP led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRUP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 88 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +5.18% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.48% | +15.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.23% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.22% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.3%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,267 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.2% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2019 to Sep 16, 2026 (6.9 years).
DRUP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
DRUP vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is an ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DRUP returned +5.48% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, DRUP is up 5.18% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, DRUP compounded at +20.23% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.22% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, DRUP has the edge at +15.86% annualized vs +15.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DRUP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 16.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.3% for DRUP and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRUP charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRUP currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
88.4% of DRUP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.7% of IVV's money is in holdings DRUP also owns.
Most of DRUP is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
40 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in DRUP and 490 in IVV, against full books of 88 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 442 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DRUP (80.0% of the fund), and 10 for DRUP that do not appear in IVV (11.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DRUP | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.40% | 5.69% | 4.71% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.94% | 3.00% | 3.94% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.58% | 1.90% | 3.68% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.23% | 1.38% | 3.85% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.59% | 0.97% | 3.62% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.58% | 0.65% | 2.93% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.26% | 0.66% | 2.60% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.21% | 0.47% | 2.74% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 2.76% | 0.32% | 2.44% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.65% | 0.35% | 2.30% |
88.4% of DRUP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRUP or IVV?
DRUP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DRUP or IVV?
Over the past year DRUP returned +5.48% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), DRUP annualized +15.86% vs +15.84% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DRUP or IVV?
DRUP has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 16.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DRUP -31.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both DRUP and IVV?
DRUP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DRUP and IVV?
88.4% of DRUP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.7% of IVV's is in holdings DRUP also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in DRUP and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRUP or IVV?
DRUP yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DRUP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DRUP led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.