EAFH vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE 50% Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EAFH or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EAFH is less concentrated, with 14.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 633 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +1.49% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.5%Best | 34.6% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EAFH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EAFH vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE 50% Hedged Equity ETF (EAFH) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EAFH is up 1.49% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFH charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFH currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of EAFH's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 633 positions we hold weights for in EAFH and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 633 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,128 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EAFH (96.9% of the fund), and 2 for EAFH that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EAFH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTXMinerals Technologies Inc. | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EAFH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFH or VTI?
EAFH has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFH or VTI?
EAFH yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EAFH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EAFH is less concentrated, with 14.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.