EAFH vs VOO
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE 50% Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EAFH or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EAFH is less concentrated, with 14.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFH | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 633 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +1.49% | +8.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.97% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.5%Best | 39.1% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EAFH vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EAFH vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE 50% Hedged Equity ETF (EAFH) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EAFH is up 1.49% versus a gain of 8.52% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFH charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFH currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 633 holdings in EAFH and 506 in VOO, totalling 98.0% and 100.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 633 positions we hold weights for in EAFH and 506 in VOO, against full books of 633 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 501 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EAFH (100.0% of the fund), and 4 for EAFH that do not appear in VOO (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EAFH and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFH or VOO?
EAFH has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFH or VOO?
EAFH yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EAFH?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EAFH is less concentrated, with 14.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.