EATZ vs IVV
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EATZ or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EATZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 22 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,336 | $18,498Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.2% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 137 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EATZ has data through Apr 30, 2026 and IVV through Sep 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2021 to Apr 30, 2026 (5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EATZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for EATZ and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EATZ charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EATZ currently yields 0.48% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
29.2% of EATZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings EATZ also owns.
EATZ and IVV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 213 days apart, EATZ as of Jan 30, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EATZ and 490 in IVV, against full books of 22 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 476 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EATZ (98.3% of the fund), and 15 for EATZ that do not appear in IVV (70.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
29.2% of EATZ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EATZ or IVV?
EATZ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EATZ or IVV?
EATZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EATZ -34.4% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both EATZ and IVV?
EATZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EATZ and IVV?
29.2% of EATZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's is in holdings EATZ also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EATZ and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EATZ or IVV?
EATZ yields 0.48% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EATZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.