EATZ vs IVV
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EATZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.91% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.47% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.55% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.77% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
EATZ vs IVV Performance
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EATZ returned +3.47% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, EATZ is up 2.91% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, EATZ compounded at +10.55% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.77% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EATZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for EATZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EATZ charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EATZ currently yields 0.48% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EATZ and IVV share 6 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EATZ or IVV?
EATZ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EATZ or IVV?
Over the past year EATZ returned +3.47% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EATZ annualized +2.54% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EATZ or IVV?
EATZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EATZ -34.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EATZ and IVV?
EATZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EATZ and IVV?
EATZ and IVV share 6 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EATZ or IVV?
EATZ yields 0.48% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.