EATZ vs VYM
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EATZ or VYM?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EATZ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 22 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,336 | $17,545Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 134 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EATZ has data through Apr 30, 2026 and VYM through Sep 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2021 to Apr 30, 2026 (5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EATZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for EATZ and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EATZ charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EATZ currently yields 0.48% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
22.7% of EATZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.4% of VYM's money is in holdings EATZ also owns.
EATZ and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 151 days apart, EATZ as of Jan 30, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
5 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EATZ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 22 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 563 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EATZ (97.1% of the fund), and 15 for EATZ that do not appear in VYM (72.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
22.7% of EATZ is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EATZ or VYM?
EATZ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EATZ or VYM?
EATZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EATZ -34.4% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both EATZ and VYM?
EATZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EATZ and VYM?
22.7% of EATZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.4% of VYM's is in holdings EATZ also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EATZ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, EATZ or VYM?
EATZ yields 0.48% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EATZ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.