EATZ vs QQQ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EATZ | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.91% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.47% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.55% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.77% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EATZ vs QQQ Performance
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EATZ returned +3.47% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, EATZ is up 2.91% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, EATZ compounded at +10.55% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.77% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.3% for EATZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for EATZ and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EATZ charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EATZ currently yields 0.48% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EATZ and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 123 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EATZ | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DASH | 2.77% | 0.37% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EATZ or QQQ?
EATZ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EATZ or QQQ?
Over the past year EATZ returned +3.47% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EATZ annualized +2.54% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EATZ or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.3% for EATZ. Worst drawdown: EATZ -34.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EATZ and QQQ?
EATZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EATZ and QQQ?
EATZ and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EATZ or QQQ?
EATZ yields 0.48% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EATZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.