EATZ vs VTI
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EATZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.91% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.47% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.55% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.77% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
EATZ vs VTI Performance
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EATZ returned +3.47% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, EATZ is up 2.91% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, EATZ compounded at +10.55% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.77% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.08% annualized vs +2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EATZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for EATZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EATZ charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EATZ currently yields 0.48% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EATZ and VTI share 17 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EATZ or VTI?
EATZ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EATZ or VTI?
Over the past year EATZ returned +3.47% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EATZ annualized +2.54% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EATZ or VTI?
EATZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EATZ -34.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EATZ and VTI?
EATZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EATZ and VTI?
EATZ and VTI share 17 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EATZ or VTI?
EATZ yields 0.48% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.