EDV vs VB
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VB has a lower expense ratio. VB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VB offers more diversification with 1,311 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $79.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 1.22% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 1,311 | |
| YTD Return | -3.69% | +17.13% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.13% | +21.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -3.93% | +17.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.49% | +7.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 18.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -61.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Jan 26, 2004 |
EDV vs VB Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (VB) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -1.13% while VB returned +21.90%. Year to date, EDV is down 3.69% versus a gain of 17.13% for VB.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -3.93% per year against +17.26% for VB; over five years the annualized figures are -12.49% and +7.59% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VB has the edge at +8.81% annualized vs -1.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 18.9% for VB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -61.0% for VB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VB charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.22% for VB.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VB share 0 holdings out of 1377 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VB?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VB charges 0.03%. VB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VB?
Over the past year EDV returned -1.13% vs +21.90% for VB, so VB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.37% vs +8.81% for VB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VB?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 18.9% for VB. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VB -61.0%.
Should I hold both EDV and VB?
EDV and VB have a monthly-return correlation of -0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VB?
EDV and VB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1377 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VB?
EDV yields 5.42% while VB yields 1.22%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.