EDV vs VB
EDV vs VB
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Small Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VB has a lower expense ratio. VB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VB offers more diversification with 1112 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.5B | $81.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.83% | 1.48% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 1,324 | |
| YTD Return | -4.55% | +17.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.35% | +29.09% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.75% | +16.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.33% | +8.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 18.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -61.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Jan 26, 2004 |
EDV vs VB Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -4.35% while VB returned +29.09%. Year to date, EDV is down 4.55% versus a gain of 17.82% for VB.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.75% per year against +16.24% for VB; over five years the annualized figures are -12.33% and +8.18% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VB has the edge at +8.86% annualized vs -1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 18.9% for VB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -61.0% for VB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VB charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 4.83% against 1.48% for VB.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VB share 0 holdings out of 1188 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VB?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VB charges 0.03%. VB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VB?
Over the past year EDV returned -4.35% vs +29.09% for VB, so VB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.42% vs +8.86% for VB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VB?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 18.9% for VB. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VB -61.0%.
Should I hold both EDV and VB?
EDV and VB have a monthly-return correlation of -0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VB?
EDV and VB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1188 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VB?
EDV yields 4.83% while VB yields 1.48%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.