EDV vs VEA
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
Quick Verdict
VEA has a lower expense ratio. VEA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VEA offers more diversification with 3,918 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $230.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 2.55% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 3,918 | |
| YTD Return | -4.05% | +16.41% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.50% | +27.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.48% | +20.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.62% | +10.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 17.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -62.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Jul 20, 2007 |
EDV vs VEA Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -2.50% while VEA returned +27.39%. Year to date, EDV is down 4.05% versus a gain of 16.41% for VEA.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.48% per year against +20.46% for VEA; over five years the annualized figures are -12.62% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VEA has the edge at +3.14% annualized vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 17.8% for VEA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -62.9% for VEA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VEA charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 2.55% for VEA.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VEA share 0 holdings out of 3820 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VEA?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VEA charges 0.03%. VEA is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VEA?
Over the past year EDV returned -2.50% vs +27.39% for VEA, so VEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.39% vs +3.14% for VEA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VEA?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 17.8% for VEA. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VEA -62.9%.
Should I hold both EDV and VEA?
EDV and VEA have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VEA?
EDV and VEA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3820 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VEA?
EDV yields 5.42% while VEA yields 2.55%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.