EDV vs VONG
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
EDV has a lower expense ratio. VONG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VONG offers more diversification with 386 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VONG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $3.5B | $44.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.83% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 390 | |
| YTD Return | -5.81% | +5.76% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.23% | +11.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.61% | +22.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.39% | +12.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -32.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Sep 20, 2010 |
EDV vs VONG Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -4.23% while VONG returned +11.11%. Year to date, EDV is down 5.81% versus a gain of 5.76% for VONG.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.61% per year against +22.46% for VONG; over five years the annualized figures are -12.39% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.78% annualized vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.9% for VONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -32.7% for VONG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VONG charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 4.83% against 0.54% for VONG.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VONG share 0 holdings out of 462 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VONG?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VONG charges 0.06%. EDV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VONG?
Over the past year EDV returned -4.23% vs +11.11% for VONG, so VONG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDV annualized -1.49% vs +15.78% for VONG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VONG?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.9% for VONG. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VONG -32.7%.
Should I hold both EDV and VONG?
EDV and VONG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VONG?
EDV and VONG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 462 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VONG?
EDV yields 4.83% while VONG yields 0.54%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.