EDV vs VV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VV has a lower expense ratio. VV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VV offers more diversification with 437 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $52.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 1.03% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 437 | |
| YTD Return | -4.05% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.50% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.48% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.62% | +12.53% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -56.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Jan 27, 2004 |
EDV vs VV Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF (VV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -2.50% while VV returned +20.36%. Year to date, EDV is down 4.05% versus a gain of 13.38% for VV.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.48% per year against +22.17% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are -12.62% and +12.53% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VV has the edge at +9.49% annualized vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 14.8% for VV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.03% for VV.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VV share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VV?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VV charges 0.03%. VV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VV?
Over the past year EDV returned -2.50% vs +20.36% for VV, so VV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.39% vs +9.49% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VV?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 14.8% for VV. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VV -56.0%.
Should I hold both EDV and VV?
EDV and VV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VV?
EDV and VV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VV?
EDV yields 5.42% while VV yields 1.03%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.