EDV vs XLK
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Quick Verdict
EDV has a lower expense ratio. XLK delivered stronger 1-year returns. EDV offers more diversification with 163 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | XLK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.08% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $124.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 0.45% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | -5.40% | +27.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.65% | +41.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -3.12% | +30.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.98% | +19.55% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 23.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -82.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Dec 16, 1998 |
EDV vs XLK Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year EDV returned -3.65% while XLK returned +41.67%. Year to date, EDV is down 5.40% versus a gain of 27.20% for XLK.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -3.12% per year against +30.51% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are -12.98% and +19.55% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, XLK has the edge at +9.37% annualized vs -1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 21.8% for EDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -82.0% for XLK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $8 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 0.45% for XLK.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and XLK share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or XLK?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while XLK charges 0.08%. EDV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or XLK?
Over the past year EDV returned -3.65% vs +41.67% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.47% vs +9.37% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or XLK?
XLK has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 21.8% for EDV. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs XLK -82.0%.
Should I hold both EDV and XLK?
EDV and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and XLK?
EDV and XLK share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or XLK?
EDV yields 5.42% while XLK yields 0.45%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.