EFAS vs QQQ
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EFAS delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $56M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.12% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.66% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.86% | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EFAS vs QQQ Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EFAS returned +27.66% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, EFAS is up 21.12% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +27.86% per year against +26.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +15.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.6% for EFAS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $18 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.52% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EFAS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or QQQ?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAS or QQQ?
Over the past year EFAS returned +27.66% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so EFAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.26% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.6% for EFAS. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EFAS and QQQ?
EFAS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAS and QQQ?
EFAS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or QQQ?
EFAS yields 4.52% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.