EFAS vs VTI
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EFAS or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EFAS led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.54% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 59 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +19.72%Best | +11.65% |
| 1Y Return | +26.32%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.62%Best | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.52%Best | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,697Best | $17,404 |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2016 to Sep 10, 2026 (9.8 years).
EFAS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
EFAS vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAS returned +26.32% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, EFAS is up 19.72% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +26.62% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.52% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.89% annualized vs +8.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.54% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.1% of EFAS's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
EFAS and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in EFAS and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 59 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EFAS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGP:AUStockland | 2.07% | 0.00% | 2.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EFAS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or VTI?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFAS or VTI?
Over the past year EFAS returned +26.32% vs +17.34% for VTI, so EFAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.08% vs +13.89% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFAS or VTI?
EFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EFAS and VTI?
EFAS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAS and VTI?
At least 2.1% of EFAS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in EFAS and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or VTI?
EFAS yields 4.54% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EFAS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EFAS led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.