EFAS vs VOO
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EFAS or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EFAS led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOO over the full window. EFAS is less concentrated, with 23.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $65M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 59 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +21.62%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +30.32%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.31%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.59%Best | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,758Best | $18,335 |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.8 years).
EFAS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
EFAS vs VOO Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAS returned +30.32% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, EFAS is up 21.62% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +27.31% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.59% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.67% annualized vs +8.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.5% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.52% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 51 holdings in EFAS and 505 in VOO, totalling 99.2% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in EFAS and 505 in VOO, against full books of 59 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EFAS (99.5% of the fund), and 2 for EFAS that do not appear in VOO (3.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EFAS and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or VOO?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFAS or VOO?
Over the past year EFAS returned +30.32% vs +20.08% for VOO, so EFAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.26% vs +14.67% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFAS or VOO?
EFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.5% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EFAS and VOO?
EFAS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or VOO?
EFAS yields 4.52% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EFAS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EFAS led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOO over the full window. EFAS is less concentrated, with 23.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.