EFAS vs VOO
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EFAS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.23% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.31% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.27% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.19% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EFAS vs VOO Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAS returned +26.31% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, EFAS is up 20.23% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +27.27% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.19% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.52% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EFAS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or VOO?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAS or VOO?
Over the past year EFAS returned +26.31% vs +21.79% for VOO, so EFAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.19% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAS or VOO?
EFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EFAS and VOO?
EFAS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAS and VOO?
EFAS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or VOO?
EFAS yields 4.52% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.