EFAS vs VYM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EFAS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $56M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +20.23% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.31% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.27% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.19% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EFAS vs VYM Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAS returned +26.31% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, EFAS is up 20.23% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +27.27% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.19% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, EFAS has the edge at +8.19% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.52% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EFAS and VYM share 0 holdings out of 652 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or VYM?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAS or VYM?
Over the past year EFAS returned +26.31% vs +24.22% for VYM, so EFAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.19% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAS or VYM?
EFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EFAS and VYM?
EFAS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAS and VYM?
EFAS and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 652 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or VYM?
EFAS yields 4.52% while VYM yields 2.24%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.