EFAS vs SCHD
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $56M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +20.71% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.81% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.43% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.28% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EFAS vs SCHD Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EFAS returned +26.81% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, EFAS is up 20.71% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +27.43% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +14.28% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $6 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.52% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EFAS and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 149 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or SCHD?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAS or SCHD?
Over the past year EFAS returned +26.81% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.23% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAS or SCHD?
EFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EFAS and SCHD?
EFAS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAS and SCHD?
EFAS and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 149 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or SCHD?
EFAS yields 4.52% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.