EFAS vs VXUS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $56M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +20.23% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.31% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.27% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.19% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EFAS vs VXUS Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAS returned +26.31% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, EFAS is up 20.23% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, EFAS compounded at +27.27% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.19% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, EFAS has the edge at +8.19% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for EFAS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAS charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAS currently yields 4.52% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EFAS and VXUS share 32 holdings out of 7886 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAS or VXUS?
EFAS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAS or VXUS?
Over the past year EFAS returned +26.31% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EFAS annualized +8.19% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAS or VXUS?
EFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EFAS -51.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EFAS and VXUS?
EFAS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAS and VXUS?
EFAS and VXUS share 32 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7886 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAS or VXUS?
EFAS yields 4.52% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so EFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.