EMMF vs VOO
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMMF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMMF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $181M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 204 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.40% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.76% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.74% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMMF vs VOO Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMMF returned +30.76% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, EMMF is up 18.40% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, EMMF compounded at +19.74% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.20% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMMF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.9% for EMMF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMMF charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMMF currently yields 2.02% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMMF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 709 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMMF or VOO?
EMMF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMMF or VOO?
Over the past year EMMF returned +30.76% vs +21.62% for VOO, so EMMF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMMF annualized +7.11% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMMF or VOO?
EMMF has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMMF -34.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMMF and VOO?
EMMF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMMF and VOO?
EMMF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 709 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMMF or VOO?
EMMF yields 2.02% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EMMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.