EMMF vs IVV
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMMF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMMF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $181M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 204 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.40% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.76% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.74% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
EMMF vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMMF returned +30.76% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, EMMF is up 18.40% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, EMMF compounded at +19.74% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.20% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EMMF has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.2% for EMMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.9% for EMMF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMMF charges 0.48% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMMF currently yields 2.02% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMMF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 709 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMMF or IVV?
EMMF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMMF or IVV?
Over the past year EMMF returned +30.76% vs +21.62% for IVV, so EMMF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMMF annualized +7.11% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMMF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.2% for EMMF. Worst drawdown: EMMF -34.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMMF and IVV?
EMMF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMMF and IVV?
EMMF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 709 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMMF or IVV?
EMMF yields 2.02% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EMMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.