EMMF vs VXUS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMMF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMMF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $181M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 204 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.09% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.57% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.06% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.68% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMMF vs VXUS Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMMF returned +31.57% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, EMMF is up 19.09% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, EMMF compounded at +20.06% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.68% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EMMF has the edge at +7.20% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.3% for EMMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.9% for EMMF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMMF charges 0.48% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $5 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMMF currently yields 2.02% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMMF and VXUS share 171 holdings out of 7902 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMMF or VXUS?
EMMF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMMF or VXUS?
Over the past year EMMF returned +31.57% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so EMMF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMMF annualized +7.20% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMMF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.3% for EMMF. Worst drawdown: EMMF -34.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMMF and VXUS?
EMMF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMMF and VXUS?
EMMF and VXUS share 171 common holdings with a 10.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7902 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMMF or VXUS?
EMMF yields 2.02% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.