ENHU vs RECS
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Which is better, ENHU or RECS?
Nearly the same fund. RECS costs less.
RECS has a lower expense ratio. ENHU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ENHU is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENHU | RECS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $6.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.00% |
| Holdings | 708 | 716 |
| YTD Return | +12.74%Best | +9.52% |
| 1Y Return | +13.49%Best | +10.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.62% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0% | -8.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,413Best | $11,149 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.2%Best | 43.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).
ENHU vs RECS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ENHU vs RECS Performance
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year ENHU returned +13.49% while RECS returned +10.43%. Year to date, ENHU is up 12.74% versus a gain of 9.52% for RECS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 10.8% for RECS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for ENHU and -8.8% for RECS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENHU charges 0.22% per year while RECS charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $15 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENHU currently yields 0.74% against 1.00% for RECS.
Holdings Overlap
41.0% of ENHU's money is in holdings RECS also owns. 70.7% of RECS's money is in holdings ENHU also owns.
Most of RECS is already inside ENHU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
121 positions in common, counted across the 351 positions we hold weights for in ENHU and 354 in RECS, against full books of 708 and 716.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 222 positions for RECS that do not appear in our book for ENHU (28.4% of the fund), and 211 for ENHU that do not appear in RECS (58.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENHU | Weight in RECS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.43% | 12.07% | 4.64% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.26% | 12.24% | 4.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.46% | 4.71% | 2.25% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.58% | 2.12% | 0.54% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.84% | 2.48% | 1.64% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.70% | 1.65% | 0.95% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.65% | 1.63% | 0.98% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.75% | 1.40% | 0.65% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.82% | 1.01% | 0.19% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 0.63% | 1.11% | 0.48% |
70.7% of RECS is already inside ENHU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENHU or RECS?
ENHU has an expense ratio of 0.22% while RECS charges 0.15%. RECS is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ENHU or RECS?
Over the past year ENHU returned +13.49% vs +10.43% for RECS, so ENHU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ENHU annualized +14.13% vs +11.49% for RECS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ENHU or RECS?
ENHU has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 10.8% for RECS. Worst drawdown: ENHU -9.0% vs RECS -8.8%.
Should I hold both ENHU and RECS?
ENHU and RECS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ENHU and RECS?
70.7% of RECS's money is in holdings ENHU also owns. 70.7% of RECS's is in holdings ENHU also owns. They hold 121 positions in common, counted across the 351 positions we hold weights for in ENHU and 354 in RECS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENHU or RECS?
ENHU yields 0.74% while RECS yields 1.00%, so RECS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RECS better than ENHU?
RECS has a lower expense ratio. ENHU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ENHU is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.