EQWL vs SCHD
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, EQWL or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EQWL led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. EQWL is less concentrated, with 12.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQWL | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $2.9B | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 104 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +11.52% | +24.04%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | +27.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.89%Best | +15.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.80%Best | +9.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.8% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,467Best | $15,959 |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 16, 2026 (14.9 years).
EQWL vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
EQWL vs SCHD Performance
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EQWL returned +17.38% while SCHD returned +27.95%. Year to date, EQWL is up 11.52% versus a gain of 24.04% for SCHD.
Over three years, EQWL compounded at +18.89% per year against +15.51% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +11.80% and +9.80% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, EQWL has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs +11.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.8% for EQWL and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQWL charges 0.25% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $6 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQWL currently yields 1.52% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
19.0% of EQWL's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 67.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings EQWL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in EQWL and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 104 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 80 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for EQWL (32.9% of the fund), and 82 for EQWL that do not appear in SCHD (80.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQWL | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.16% | 4.77% | 3.61% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.20% | 4.70% | 3.50% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 1.16% | 4.69% | 3.53% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.00% | 4.17% | 3.17% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.03% | 4.02% | 2.99% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.04% | 3.94% | 2.90% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 1.00% | 3.97% | 2.97% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.97% | 3.88% | 2.91% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.91% | 3.83% | 2.92% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.90% | 3.82% | 2.92% |
67.0% of SCHD is already inside EQWL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQWL or SCHD?
EQWL has an expense ratio of 0.25% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQWL or SCHD?
Over the past year EQWL returned +17.38% vs +27.95% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EQWL annualized +12.98% vs +11.29% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQWL or SCHD?
EQWL has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EQWL -34.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EQWL and SCHD?
EQWL and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EQWL and SCHD?
67.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings EQWL also owns. 67.0% of SCHD's is in holdings EQWL also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in EQWL and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQWL or SCHD?
EQWL yields 1.52% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than EQWL?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EQWL led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. EQWL is less concentrated, with 12.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.