ERET vs IVV
iShares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERET | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.22% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 355 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.72% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.67% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.20% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
ERET vs IVV Performance
iShares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ERET returned +12.67% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ERET is up 10.72% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ERET compounded at +11.20% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, ERET has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ERET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.3% for ERET and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERET charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERET currently yields 3.22% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ERET and IVV share 26 holdings out of 810 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERET or IVV?
ERET has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ERET or IVV?
Over the past year ERET returned +12.67% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ERET annualized +8.14% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ERET or IVV?
ERET has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ERET -20.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ERET and IVV?
ERET and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ERET and IVV?
ERET and IVV share 26 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 810 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERET or IVV?
ERET yields 3.22% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ERET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.