FDEV vs VTI
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDEV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $283M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.94% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 212 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.78% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.91% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.60% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.36% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
FDEV vs VTI Performance
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDEV returned +15.91% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, FDEV is up 8.78% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, FDEV compounded at +16.60% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.36% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FDEV has the edge at +8.41% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.9% for FDEV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for FDEV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDEV charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDEV currently yields 2.94% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FDEV and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2986 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDEV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AM | 0.36% | 0.01% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDEV or VTI?
FDEV has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDEV or VTI?
Over the past year FDEV returned +15.91% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FDEV annualized +8.41% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDEV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.9% for FDEV. Worst drawdown: FDEV -30.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FDEV and VTI?
FDEV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDEV and VTI?
FDEV and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2986 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDEV or VTI?
FDEV yields 2.94% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FDEV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.