FDRS vs IVV

FDRS vs IVV

Which is better, FDRS or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFDRSIVV
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$57M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings52508
YTD Return+3.60%+12.01%Best
1Y Return-+16.48%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.21%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight57.2%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyCorgi Strategies, LLCiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 29, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FDRS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FDRS vs IVV Performance

Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FDRS is up 3.60% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FDRS charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

FDRS already in IVV81.8%
IVV already in FDRS16.1%

81.8% of FDRS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.1% of IVV's money is in holdings FDRS also owns.

Most of FDRS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

31 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FDRS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 52 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 451 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FDRS (82.5% of the fund), and 16 for FDRS that do not appear in IVV (13.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FDRSWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp9.56%8.07%1.49%
METAMeta Platforms Inc9.34%1.90%7.44%
TSLATesla Inc8.54%1.56%6.98%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc7.41%0.65%6.76%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common4.64%0.38%4.26%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc4.09%0.35%3.74%
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity3.73%0.32%3.41%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock3.68%0.30%3.38%
BLKBlackrock Funding Inc/De3.02%0.25%2.77%
DELLDell Technologies Inc2.63%0.20%2.43%

81.8% of FDRS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FDRSIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FDRS or IVV?

FDRS has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FDRS and IVV?

81.8% of FDRS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.1% of IVV's is in holdings FDRS also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FDRS and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, FDRS or IVV?

FDRS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FDRS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.