FEAT vs IVV
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 79.92% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -7.24% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.95% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
FEAT vs IVV Performance
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, FEAT is down 7.24% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for FEAT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAT charges 0.93% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAT currently yields 79.92% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FEAT and IVV share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAT or IVV?
FEAT has an expense ratio of 0.93% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAT or IVV?
Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAT annualized -15.25% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAT or IVV?
FEAT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FEAT -33.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FEAT and IVV?
FEAT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAT and IVV?
FEAT and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAT or IVV?
FEAT yields 79.92% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.