FEAT vs QQQ
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $11M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 79.92% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -7.24% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.95% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FEAT vs QQQ Performance
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, FEAT is down 7.24% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.6% for FEAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for FEAT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAT charges 0.93% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $18 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAT currently yields 79.92% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FEAT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAT or QQQ?
FEAT has an expense ratio of 0.93% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAT or QQQ?
Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAT annualized -15.25% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.6% for FEAT. Worst drawdown: FEAT -33.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FEAT and QQQ?
FEAT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAT and QQQ?
FEAT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAT or QQQ?
FEAT yields 79.92% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.