FEAT vs VYM
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $11M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 79.92% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -7.24% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.95% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FEAT vs VYM Performance
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FEAT is down 7.24% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for FEAT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAT charges 0.93% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $4 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAT currently yields 79.92% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FEAT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAT or VYM?
FEAT has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAT or VYM?
Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAT annualized -15.25% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAT or VYM?
FEAT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FEAT -33.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FEAT and VYM?
FEAT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAT and VYM?
FEAT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAT or VYM?
FEAT yields 79.92% while VYM yields 2.86%, so FEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.