FEAT vs VOO
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 79.92% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -7.24% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.95% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FEAT vs VOO Performance
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, FEAT is down 7.24% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for FEAT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAT charges 0.93% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAT currently yields 79.92% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FEAT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAT or VOO?
FEAT has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAT or VOO?
Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAT annualized -15.25% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAT or VOO?
FEAT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FEAT -33.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FEAT and VOO?
FEAT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAT and VOO?
FEAT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAT or VOO?
FEAT yields 79.92% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.