FEAT vs SCHD
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $11M | $112.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 79.92% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 103 | |
| YTD Return | -7.24% | +27.93% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.95% | +30.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FEAT vs SCHD Performance
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% while SCHD returned +30.06%. Year to date, FEAT is down 7.24% versus a gain of 27.93% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for FEAT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAT charges 0.93% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $6 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAT currently yields 79.92% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FEAT and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAT or SCHD?
FEAT has an expense ratio of 0.93% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAT or SCHD?
Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% vs +30.06% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAT annualized -15.25% vs +11.56% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAT or SCHD?
FEAT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FEAT -33.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FEAT and SCHD?
FEAT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAT and SCHD?
FEAT and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAT or SCHD?
FEAT yields 79.92% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so FEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.