FEAT vs VTI
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 79.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -7.24% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.95% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
FEAT vs VTI Performance
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, FEAT is down 7.24% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for FEAT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAT charges 0.93% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAT currently yields 79.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FEAT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAT or VTI?
FEAT has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAT or VTI?
Over the past year FEAT returned -12.95% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAT annualized -15.25% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAT or VTI?
FEAT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FEAT -33.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FEAT and VTI?
FEAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAT and VTI?
FEAT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAT or VTI?
FEAT yields 79.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.