FEIG vs VOO
Northern Trust ESG & Climate Investment Grade Corporate Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FEIG or VOO?
Preferred Stock against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEIG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $49M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 4.92% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 1,049 | 519 |
| YTD Return | -1.21% | +11.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.84% | +11.71%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.07% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.58% | +11.55%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.2%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,713 | $17,272Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.4% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Preferred Stock | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 21, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026 (5.1 years).
FEIG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
FEIG vs VOO Performance
Northern Trust ESG & Climate Investment Grade Corporate Core ETF (FEIG) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEIG returned -0.84% while VOO returned +11.71%. Year to date, FEIG is down 1.21% versus a gain of 11.07% for VOO.
Over three years, FEIG compounded at +5.07% per year against +21.10% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.58% and +11.55% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 8.2% for FEIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for FEIG and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEIG charges 0.12% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEIG currently yields 4.92% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
96.5% of FEIG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 61.3% of VOO's money is in holdings FEIG also owns.
Most of FEIG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
214 positions in common, counted across the 249 positions we hold weights for in FEIG and 506 in VOO, against full books of 1,049 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 289 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FEIG (38.7% of the fund), and 30 for FEIG that do not appear in VOO (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FEIG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.87% | 8.39% | 3.52% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 5.13% | 7.38% | 2.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.30% | 5.78% | 0.48% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.54% | 2.54% | 2.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.52% | 1.83% | 2.69% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.89% | 1.41% | 2.48% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.92% | 1.33% | 2.59% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.31% | 1.41% | 1.90% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.24% | 1.02% | 2.22% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.70% | 0.97% | 1.73% |
96.5% of FEIG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEIG or VOO?
FEIG has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FEIG or VOO?
Over the past year FEIG returned -0.84% vs +11.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEIG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 8.2% for FEIG. Worst drawdown: FEIG -22.3% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both FEIG and VOO?
FEIG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FEIG and VOO?
96.5% of FEIG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 61.3% of VOO's is in holdings FEIG also owns. They hold 214 positions in common, counted across the 249 positions we hold weights for in FEIG and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEIG or VOO?
FEIG yields 4.92% while VOO yields 1.05%, so FEIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FEIG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.