FEMG vs SCHD

FEMG vs SCHD

Which is better, FEMG or SCHD?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDLess Concentrated: FEMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMGSCHD
Expense Ratio0.23%0.06%Best
AUM$6M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.09%3.00%
Holdings154103
YTD Return+3.29%+25.07%Best
1Y Return-+27.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+15.74%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.89%
Top 10 Weight22.3%Best41.8%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionApr 28, 2026Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMG vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMG vs SCHD Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, FEMG is up 3.29% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMG charges 0.23% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $6 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMG currently yields 0.09% against 3.00% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

FEMG already in SCHD3.4%
SCHD already in FEMG4.3%

3.4% of FEMG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 4.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings FEMG also owns.

SCHD and FEMG share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 154 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 93 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FEMG (95.6% of the fund), and 148 for FEMG that do not appear in SCHD (93.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMGWeight in SCHDDifference
FASTFastenal Co.1.91%1.38%0.53%
PAYXPaychex, Inc.0.31%1.00%0.69%
ARESAres Management Corp Common Stock0.29%0.74%0.45%
DRIDarden Restaurants Inc.0.24%0.60%0.36%
BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.61%0.22%0.39%
DINOHollyfrontier0.04%0.38%0.34%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FEMG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FEMGSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMG or SCHD?

FEMG has an expense ratio of 0.23% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMG and SCHD?

4.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings FEMG also owns. 4.3% of SCHD's is in holdings FEMG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 100 in SCHD.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMG or SCHD?

FEMG yields 0.09% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than FEMG?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.