FEMG vs VOO

FEMG vs VOO

Which is better, FEMG or VOO?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: FEMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMGVOO
Expense Ratio0.23%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.09%1.04%
Holdings154509
YTD Return+3.29%+12.50%Best
1Y Return-+17.58%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight22.3%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 28, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMG vs VOO Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FEMG is up 3.29% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMG charges 0.23% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMG currently yields 0.09% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

FEMG already in VOO46.9%
VOO already in FEMG4.3%

46.9% of FEMG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.3% of VOO's money is in holdings FEMG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

59 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 154 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 437 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FEMG (95.2% of the fund), and 95 for FEMG that do not appear in VOO (49.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMGWeight in VOODifference
DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A2.56%0.13%2.43%
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.2.21%0.11%2.10%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.2.13%0.09%2.04%
TERTeradyne Inc1.89%0.12%1.77%
FASTFastenal Co.1.91%0.09%1.82%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.1.82%0.08%1.74%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc1.75%0.10%1.65%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc1.53%0.11%1.42%
EXPEExpedia Group Inc.1.52%0.05%1.47%
TPRTapestry Inc.1.49%0.05%1.44%

46.9% of FEMG is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FEMGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMG or VOO?

FEMG has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMG and VOO?

46.9% of FEMG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.3% of VOO's is in holdings FEMG also owns. They hold 59 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMG or VOO?

FEMG yields 0.09% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than FEMG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.