FEMG vs IVV

FEMG vs IVV

Which is better, FEMG or IVV?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: FEMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMGIVV
Expense Ratio0.23%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.09%1.06%
Holdings154508
YTD Return+3.29%+12.51%Best
1Y Return-+17.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight22.3%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 28, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMG vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMG vs IVV Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FEMG is up 3.29% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMG charges 0.23% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMG currently yields 0.09% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

FEMG already in IVV46.1%
IVV already in FEMG4.1%

46.1% of FEMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.1% of IVV's money is in holdings FEMG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

58 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 154 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 437 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FEMG (95.3% of the fund), and 96 for FEMG that do not appear in IVV (50.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMGWeight in IVVDifference
DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A2.56%0.14%2.42%
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.2.21%0.09%2.12%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.2.13%0.08%2.05%
FASTFastenal Co.1.91%0.09%1.82%
TERTeradyne Inc1.89%0.09%1.80%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.1.82%0.07%1.75%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc1.75%0.10%1.65%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc1.53%0.11%1.42%
EXPEExpedia Group Inc.1.52%0.06%1.46%
TPRTapestry Inc.1.49%0.05%1.44%

46.1% of FEMG is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FEMGIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMG or IVV?

FEMG has an expense ratio of 0.23% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMG and IVV?

46.1% of FEMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.1% of IVV's is in holdings FEMG also owns. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMG or IVV?

FEMG yields 0.09% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FEMG?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.