FEMG vs VTI

FEMG vs VTI

Which is better, FEMG or VTI?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: FEMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMGVTI
Expense Ratio0.23%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.19%1.06%
Holdings3463,542
YTD Return-0.31%+12.23%Best
1Y Return-+12.74%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.44%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.83%
Top 10 Weight22.7%Best34.6%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 28, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMG vs VTI Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FEMG is down 0.31% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMG charges 0.23% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMG currently yields 0.19% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

FEMG already in VTI96.7%
VTI already in FEMG6.0%

96.7% of FEMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.0% of VTI's money is in holdings FEMG also owns.

Most of FEMG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

160 positions in common, counted across the 169 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 346 and 3,542.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 978 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FEMG (91.0% of the fund), and 2 for FEMG that do not appear in VTI (0.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMGWeight in VTIDifference
SNOWSnowflake Inc3.44%0.15%3.29%
NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup)3.16%0.15%3.01%
DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A2.91%0.13%2.78%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp.2.20%0.15%2.05%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.2.06%0.06%2.00%
FASTFastenal Co1.95%0.08%1.87%
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.1.92%0.08%1.84%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc1.72%0.12%1.60%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred1.65%0.08%1.57%
HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A1.47%0.12%1.35%

96.7% of FEMG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FEMGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMG or VTI?

FEMG has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMG and VTI?

96.7% of FEMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.0% of VTI's is in holdings FEMG also owns. They hold 160 positions in common, counted across the 169 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 3,464 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMG or VTI?

FEMG yields 0.19% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FEMG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.