FFTY vs SCHD
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $80M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.39% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.53% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FFTY vs SCHD Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, FFTY is up 5.19% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +15.63% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -3.53% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $6 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.07% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FFTY and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or SCHD?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFTY or SCHD?
Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.98% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFTY or SCHD?
FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FFTY and SCHD?
FFTY and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and SCHD?
FFTY and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or SCHD?
FFTY yields 1.07% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.