FFTY vs VOO
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $80M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.39% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.53% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FFTY vs VOO Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, FFTY is up 5.19% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +15.63% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -3.53% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.07% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FFTY and VOO share 18 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or VOO?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFTY or VOO?
Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.98% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFTY or VOO?
FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FFTY and VOO?
FFTY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and VOO?
FFTY and VOO share 18 common holdings with a 10.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or VOO?
FFTY yields 1.07% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.