FFTY vs QQQ
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FFTY or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFTY is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 52 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +4.07% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.74% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | +24.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.34% | +14.18%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 18.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,600 | $19,407Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (11.4 years).
FFTY vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.
FFTY vs QQQ Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is an ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFTY returned +4.74% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, FFTY is up 4.07% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +15.91% per year against +24.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -5.34% and +14.18% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.48% annualized vs +3.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.27% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
4.5% of FFTY's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 8.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings FFTY also owns.
QQQ and FFTY share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FFTY and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 52 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FFTY (89.1% of the fund), and 43 for FFTY that do not appear in QQQ (85.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFTY and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or QQQ?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFTY or QQQ?
Over the past year FFTY returned +4.74% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.86% vs +18.48% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFTY or QQQ?
FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both FFTY and QQQ?
FFTY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and QQQ?
8.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings FFTY also owns. 8.4% of QQQ's is in holdings FFTY also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FFTY and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or QQQ?
FFTY yields 1.27% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FFTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FFTY?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFTY is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.