FFTY vs QQQ
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $80M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.25% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.42% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.05% | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.36% | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FFTY vs QQQ Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFTY returned +9.42% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, FFTY is up 5.25% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +17.05% per year against +26.07% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -3.36% and +15.16% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.4% for FFTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.07% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FFTY and QQQ share 13 holdings out of 141 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or QQQ?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFTY or QQQ?
Over the past year FFTY returned +9.42% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.98% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFTY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.4% for FFTY. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FFTY and QQQ?
FFTY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and QQQ?
FFTY and QQQ share 13 common holdings with a 15.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 141 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or QQQ?
FFTY yields 1.07% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FFTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.