FFTY vs IVV
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $80M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.39% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.53% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
FFTY vs IVV Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, FFTY is up 5.19% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +15.63% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -3.53% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.07% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FFTY and IVV share 17 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or IVV?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFTY or IVV?
Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.98% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFTY or IVV?
FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FFTY and IVV?
FFTY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and IVV?
FFTY and IVV share 17 common holdings with a 9.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or IVV?
FFTY yields 1.07% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.