FFTY vs IVV
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FFTY or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFTY is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.07% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.74% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.34% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,600 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.8%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (11.4 years).
FFTY vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.
FFTY vs IVV Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is an ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFTY returned +4.74% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FFTY is up 4.07% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +15.91% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -5.34% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.86% annualized vs +3.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.27% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
17.8% of FFTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.3% of IVV's money is in holdings FFTY also owns.
FFTY and IVV share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FFTY and 504 in IVV, against full books of 52 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FFTY (89.9% of the fund), and 35 for FFTY that do not appear in IVV (71.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFTY | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 0.46% | 6.86% | 6.40% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.96% | 1.39% | 1.57% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc. | 3.03% | 0.06% | 2.97% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A | 2.61% | 0.14% | 2.47% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 1.96% | 0.25% | 1.71% |
| STTStt Un Equity | 2.10% | 0.08% | 2.02% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 1.06% | 0.18% | 0.88% |
| NTAPNetapp | 1.11% | 0.06% | 1.05% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 0.97% | 0.10% | 0.87% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.12% | 0.39% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFTY and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or IVV?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFTY or IVV?
Over the past year FFTY returned +4.74% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.86% vs +12.86% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFTY or IVV?
FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FFTY and IVV?
FFTY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and IVV?
17.8% of FFTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.3% of IVV's is in holdings FFTY also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FFTY and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or IVV?
FFTY yields 1.27% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FFTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FFTY?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFTY is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.