FFTY vs VYM

FFTY vs VYM

Which is better, FFTY or VYM?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFTYVYM
Expense Ratio0.80%0.04%Best
AUM$71M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.29%2.22%
Holdings52613
YTD Return+1.29%+11.35%Best
1Y Return-5.86%+15.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+16.69%+17.22%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-5.34%+12.30%Best
Volatility (annualized)24.3%14.0%Best
Max Drawdown-59.5%-35.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$7,600$17,861Best
Top 10 Weight35.1%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyCapital-FORCE ETFVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionApr 8, 2015Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2015 to Sep 18, 2026 (11.4 years).

FFTY vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.

FFTY vs VYM Performance

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is an ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFTY returned -5.86% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, FFTY is up 1.29% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Over three years, FFTY compounded at +16.69% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -5.34% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.12% annualized vs +3.60%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFTY charges 0.80% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $4 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.29% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

FFTY already in VYM9.5%
VYM already in FFTY0.8%

9.5% of FFTY's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.8% of VYM's money is in holdings FFTY also owns.

FFTY and VYM share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FFTY and 557 in VYM, against full books of 52 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 522 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FFTY (96.3% of the fund), and 32 for FFTY that do not appear in VYM (67.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFTYWeight in VYMDifference
VCTRVictory Receivables Corp2.94%0.02%2.92%
VIRTVirtu Financial Inc Class A2.08%0.02%2.06%
SCCOSouthern Copper Corp1.97%0.07%1.90%
NEMNewmont Corp Common0.97%0.41%0.56%
STTState Street Corp.1.01%0.20%0.81%
SEICSei Investments Co.0.52%0.04%0.48%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FFTY and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FFTYVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFTY or VYM?

FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FFTY or VYM?

Over the past year FFTY returned -5.86% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.60% vs +9.12% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FFTY or VYM?

FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both FFTY and VYM?

FFTY and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and VYM?

9.5% of FFTY's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.8% of VYM's is in holdings FFTY also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FFTY and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or VYM?

FFTY yields 1.29% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than FFTY?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.