FFTY vs VTI
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $80M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.39% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.53% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
FFTY vs VTI Performance
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, FFTY is up 5.19% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, FFTY compounded at +15.63% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.53% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for FFTY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTY charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTY currently yields 1.07% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FFTY and VTI share 40 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTY or VTI?
FFTY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFTY or VTI?
Over the past year FFTY returned +9.39% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FFTY annualized +3.98% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFTY or VTI?
FFTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFTY -59.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FFTY and VTI?
FFTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFTY and VTI?
FFTY and VTI share 40 common holdings with a 10.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTY or VTI?
FFTY yields 1.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.