FIFT vs PSIL
HCM Select 50 ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, FIFT or PSIL?
PSIL costs less.
PSIL has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIFT | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 1.00%Best |
| AUM | $67M | $42M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 7.99% |
| Holdings | 50 | 71 |
| YTD Price Return | - | +11.81% |
| 1Y Price Return | - | +8.16% |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| 5Y Price Return (annualized) | - | -26.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 49.1% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -93.0% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 67.8% |
| Fund Family | Howard Capital Management | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2026 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FIFT. We have no price series for FIFT, so there is nothing to compare it against. FIFT yields 0.00% and PSIL 7.99% on top.
FIFT vs PSIL Performance
HCM Select 50 ETF (FIFT) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIFT charges 1.35% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $100 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIFT currently yields 0.00% against 7.99% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in FIFT and 25 in PSIL, totalling 99.0% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 25 in PSIL, against full books of 50 and 71.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 25 positions we hold weights for.
PSIL holds 19 positions FIFT does not, 77.3% of the fund.
Largest: CMPS 11.66%, HELP 8.39%, LLY 6.11%, ABBV 5.49%, NBIX 5.12%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FIFT and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIFT or PSIL?
FIFT has an expense ratio of 1.35% while PSIL charges 1.00%. PSIL is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIFT or PSIL?
FIFT yields 0.00% while PSIL yields 7.99%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than FIFT?
PSIL has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.