FIFT vs VYM

FIFT vs VYM

Which is better, FIFT or VYM?

VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: FIFT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFIFTVYM
Expense Ratio1.35%0.04%Best
AUM$67M$95.8B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.23%
Holdings50610
YTD Price Return-+13.93%
1Y Price Return-+16.76%
3Y Price Return (annualized)-+16.42%
5Y Price Return (annualized)-+8.31%
Volatility (annualized)-14.6%
Max Drawdown--58.8%
Top 10 Weight21.0%Best25.8%
Fund FamilyHoward Capital ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 21, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FIFT. We have no price series for FIFT, so there is nothing to compare it against. FIFT yields 0.00% and VYM 2.23% on top.

FIFT vs VYM Performance

HCM Select 50 ETF (FIFT) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US).

Fees and Cost Over Time

FIFT charges 1.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $4 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIFT currently yields 0.00% against 2.23% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

FIFT already in VYM97.1%
VYM already in FIFT11.5%

97.1% of FIFT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.5% of VYM's money is in holdings FIFT also owns.

Most of FIFT is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 60 days apart, FIFT as of Oct 30, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 602 in VYM, against full books of 50 and 610.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FIFT (87.0% of the fund), and 1 for FIFT that do not appear in VYM (1.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FIFTWeight in VYMDifference
CVXChevron Corp.2.00%1.54%0.46%
VZVerizon Communications Inc Com Usd11.98%0.84%1.14%
PFEPfizer, Inc.1.98%0.65%1.33%
TAt&t Inc Com1.87%0.71%1.16%
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co.1.98%0.55%1.43%
MOAltria Group Inc.2.02%0.46%1.56%
PGRProgressive Corp.1.96%0.51%1.45%
ACNAccenture Plc1.99%0.47%1.52%
CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A2.04%0.38%1.66%
UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc2.09%0.31%1.78%

97.1% of FIFT is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FIFTVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FIFT or VYM?

FIFT has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $131 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FIFT and VYM?

97.1% of FIFT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.5% of VYM's is in holdings FIFT also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, FIFT or VYM?

FIFT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than FIFT?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.