FLGR vs QQQ
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
FLGR has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $37M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.12% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.81% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.01% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.88% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLGR vs QQQ Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLGR returned +6.81% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, FLGR is up 5.12% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +19.01% per year against +25.51% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.88% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.9% for FLGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $18 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.43% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLGR and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 164 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLGR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APP | 4.74% | 0.60% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or QQQ?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while QQQ charges 0.18%. FLGR is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGR or QQQ?
Over the past year FLGR returned +6.81% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +5.38% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.9% for FLGR. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLGR and QQQ?
FLGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and QQQ?
FLGR and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 164 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or QQQ?
FLGR yields 3.43% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.